20111111_seoulbeats_browneyedgirls

Roundtable: What makes an idol?

27

We’re back with another Seoulbeats Roundtable, and this week we’re talking a big ticket question: who, or what, actually counts as an idol? The word ‘idol’ is thrown around pretty frequently throughout the K-poposphere, to the point where any K-celebrity could be identified as being an ‘idol.’ But are they deserving that title…or rather, are they deserving of being stuck with that title? What are the pros and cons of being an idol and do you think current idols strive to be non-idols?  Is it easier to make the transition from non-idol to an idol or vice-versa?

Young-ji: Obviously, being an idol equates to big and obsessive fan clubs; which in turn guarantees a lot of air time on music and variety shows. Also, this enables all the members to experience fame and glory even if they don’t have the talents to be an exceptional solo act because they can hide their flaws by being in the group.  For example, Big Bang, Wonder Girls, SNSD —  there are questionable group members in each group, yet they are able to experience the halo effect and live the life of an idol.

I think it’s pretty obvious why young trainees want to be idols — however, for a more long term musical career, does being an idol make sense?  The shelf life of an idol is very short — half a decade at best (perhaps Big Bang will prove us wrong) and what they can do after being an idol is rather limited. All the idol group members from the 2000s are currently nobodies — either that, or they’re trying to make something out of themselves — take a look at all the members of H.O.T., Sechs Kies, S.E.S, FinK.L; with the exception of only a few members and perhaps Shinhwa, it’s difficult for idols to redefine themselves.

What do you think?  Should future trainees strive to be idols, where they can live the life or should they strive to be real musicians? And what happens if you fall somewhere in between, like Brown Eyed Girls?

Megan: BEG, I think, are definitely idols, but idols as they should be. They have incredible voices, sell an effective image, release perfect pop music, and I’d say JeA could definitely serve as a good role model, like many claim idols should. Some would argue that they aren’t idols, sheerly because their music is good, but that kind of misses the point. They’re the tip of the idol iceberg, what idols should aspire to be! Not all idol music has to be shallow junk.

Ree: Honestly, the pros of being an idol come from the fact you’re basically spoon-fed everything. And then there’s the glamour, glitter, and all that vanity behind it. And actually, depending on your passions, it would be easier to get a headstart in a career you actually want. Example would be people like Eric, who was stuck in Shinwa for ages and in the end got a boost start for acting. And Siwon from Super Junior, his status as an idol group member with a lot of fans really did open doors for him.

But in the long term, if you want to concentrate on music for the rest of your life, idolship is probably not the best way to go. I feel like, unless you’re a particularly powerhouse vocalist (or a babe like Hyori and Hyuna), you don’t really have a chance of continuing on with a career in music whilst still somewhat being in the limelight– in fact, even AS a powerhouse vocalist people would find it hard. Which to be honest, I find kind of sad. Not that i’d want any mediocre singers making a living for themselves out of singing– but I feel like it halts the doors for any potential creativity in the industry.

I think that’s why a lot of idols are taking the route into musicals. I mean, the ones who are doing it with commitment, and not ones who are treating it like a short stint. Musicals are kind of a way for them to be able to continue singing outside of their time in the limelight.

And it’s definitely easier to transition from a non-idol to idol. Depending on how you see idol. Some people are of the opinion that if you’re born on stage a non-idol, you’re a non-idol all the way. But I don’t see why the term ‘idol’ HAS to carry so many negative connotations to be honest. As for going from idol to non-idol… depending on how big you become, that may be quite hard. I think it’ll be really hard to completely separate yourself from the ‘idol’ image — I mean, using JYJ as an example. They’ve almost completely detached themselves from mainstream K-Pop, but Jaejoong even said himself, they’re still pretty much idols, and he’s proud of carrying the term idol.

Nabeela: To be quite honest, in my opinion, the heyday of idoldom seems to be fading. A lot about the system has been revealed through lawsuits, testimony, and can even be seen in hearsay like the ’5 year curse’. It’s obviously become a business venture more than a music industry. Young’ins will always try to become idols due their lust for that glamor. On the other hand, serious musicians and artists know how fickle idol glamor can be, and I think they make an honest effort to differentiate. For example, 4Men are consiered are ‘idols’ but they don’t necessarily have idol concepts or CF deals or promote on variety programs. They feature on some music shows and that’s about it. And they are FABULOUS singers.

But one might say, “What the hell? What about Tablo? Tablo is a traitor to the underground; Tablo went non-idol to idol, blah blah blah…” but that’s a load of crap. Tablo has and always will be independent in style, and I think style is way more important that who he is making the music with. So what if he has gone ‘idol’? He still writes, composes, and produces his own music. Tablo’s case is truly interesting; it’s kind of like where idol and real music meet.

Fannie: I don’t actually think Tablo explicitly categorizes himself as anything, and I think a lot of those labels (hip hop, pop, rage against the machine, idol, non-idol, etc.) floating around were actually created by the media and the consumers themselves. If you look back at that old 2009 (?) interview Seoulbeats had with Epik High, Tablo actually states that when they’re making music, they’re not trying to create it with a particular genre or concept in mind, but rather just putting together what feels right and sounds right to them at the moment.

Back to the idol topic — personally, I think the difference between an idol and a non-idol is in their intent. The main purpose of an idol is to entertain (and music is created for them to fit a preexisting image), whereas the main purpose of a non-idol (musician) is to produce good music as a personal form of expression (image is generated from the music, instead of vice versa).

Another thing that I think is highly correlated with idol-dom is youth. It seems like once you are past a certain age, you are no longer qualified to be an idol (Kahi and Narsha are pushing that mark). Do you guys think the idea of an ‘Adult-dol’ is here to stay, or is it an exception? When does one stop being an idol?

Jean:  Fannie asked about when is an idol too old to stay an idol. While I touched on this in an older article of mine, I think it seems the majority of overseas fans are indifferent. Seems that way in Korea too, since Hyori’s still relevant, Kahi‘s still popular and well, I won’t get into Narsha‘s fame. It’s not even how long one’s been in the biz that matters either, since BoA‘s been an idol for what, a decade? Her popularity hasn’t faded. What exactly does it take to go from idol to non-idol, to become irrelevant? Ultimately, I suppose it’s simply being inactive in the news and in their career.

Unusually attractive people seek idol stardom because of the fame, the glamour, the attention. People get trained to sing and dance, so even if you’re not a naturally good singer, it’s ok. Autotune will fix that. At least you look good. Musically talented people seek it because they probably feel it’s the best way to get their music out there quickly, and appreciated by like-minded fans. Once they reach it, they can safely leave that lifestyle, go to college, but still be in the news and still have fans (like Sun-mi of the Wonder Girls). And they’re still free to create music that’ll always get listened to.

And about BEG and Tablo being idols or not: Technically, they are. Yes, they’re unconventional, but they’re still lumped into the same pool. I guess the same could be said about Tasha and Tiger JK.

Future trainees should not strive to be idols. They should instead concentrate on the most effective way of getting their music out to the public (if that’s what they want). That means having much more control over the music’s production rather than singing pre-written stuff. These labels are out there.

Related Posts

  • chelle

    I was with you until Tasha and Tiger JK

    • Anonymous

      I also don´t see those two as idols. There is a difference (not always very clear) between idols and just known and popular musicians. Not every one who is popular, younger in age and guests in variety shows is an idol.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LL4QDJLVFDT2RDIZYBALSE75JE angel29

    To Young-Ji: I’m wondering who you are referring to in BigBang as the questionable group member(s) who hide(s) flaws while being in this group.  Anyway, I still respect your opinion.  It would just be fun to comment and agree or likely disagree. LOL.

    Peace!

    • nhoki

      I’m a huge fan of Big Bang… and since day 1, when they first started . I love all of them but I still have to admit that Seungri is the not as talented as the other 4. Of course Big Bang won’t be Big Bang without Seungri. But I understand why ppl think that he is a questionable group member… 

    • Youngji

      to be honest, i can’t decide between seungri and daesung, but either way, it proves my point that there is always one useless member in the group

      • lay

        ‘it proves my point…’

        sorry … IMO it proves nothing at all cos just like what i think here, it is all your personal opinion that either Seung Ri or Dae Sung is useless.

  • Anonymous

    By the way guys, if you’re wondering that which old Seoulbeats interview with Epik High is being referenced:

    • http://babylovepop.tumblr.com loulou_v

      Thank you! This interview is great :)

  • Anonymous

    Seungri??  untalented?
    The one that co  composed/produced/choreographed  his own awesome mini album??
    The one that joined BigBang when he was only 15~? 
    The one that already has a business when he’s only in his early 20s?
    I doubted him at first too ….
    But he does wonders to BIGBANG. 

    • nhoki

      yup… Britney Spears became an international superstar at the age of 18, but still, it doesn’t mean that she’s talented. But doesn’t mean that I don’t respect her. I love Britney Spears!  
      the same goes for seungri, I respect him, and his work but meh, I feel like he is just like ur average korean idol BUT whose hardwork paid off, and managed to succeed.  

      • Anon

        i felt the same until he did his own composing, songwriting, producing and choreography. i was not the biggest fan of his mini but it was the first time i believed he was actually interested in music.

        but i do agree that the other things than innerd listed like the age at which he debuted, his business etc are not relevant to bigbang as a whole. and while he may have little to no impact on bigbang’s music and sound, he does have an impact on bigbang’s performances and their public image. his relentless fanservice and remarkable confidence really helps a group that is full of awkward, reserved, and shy people.  

    • lay

      so true … if Seung Ri is ‘untalented’, i shudder to think WHAT those members of other groups “who hide their flaws by being in a group” are!!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LL4QDJLVFDT2RDIZYBALSE75JE angel29

      I agree.  I was really confused as to who was being mentioned.  Anyway, being in BigBang actually suppresses their talents in a way (though I would still believe the effect to be a synergy) because they have to share the stage with 4 other talented individuals.  In the case of Seungri, I don’t think he is being put behind the others because of lack of talent.  Because of this talent, he has been allowed to come up with his own materials and we all know how good these materials are.  In light of BigBang’s recent events, Seungri, in fact is made to perform solo to fulfill BigBang’s obligations.

      The inclusion of BigBang in that list above still baffles me.  Of course, I’m a fan and I’m biased but still, none of the member’s situation falls under the description of being placed behind other members’ talents to hide their own flaws.  If anything, every member is being showcased with their own solo career in music (note, not being an mc or an actor or a cf model but on an actual stage).

    • http://colourmesplendid.wordpress.com Ree

      Who said she was talking about Seungri ;D

      lol JK.

      I find it funny how everyone just knew the ‘questionable member’ was Seungri, even if they disagree.

      Anyway, I actually agree with you. Sort of. He’s my bias, but I admit he doesn’t have the raw talent like some of the other members do, but he’s a hardworker. And he’s an example of talent that can be altered through hard training. He used to be so musically incapable and now he’s composing his own pieces and his vocals have improved like crazy. I think it’s upsetting that some people still hold him to the ‘Dara position’ of Big Bang that he had earlier, when he’s pretty much washed himself of that black sheep status. I’d go as far to say his mini Album as a whole was better than Big Bang’s comeback one.

      He may not be an essential member in terms of music, but he’s not useless or untalented. He doesn’t excel at anything, and you know, he’ll be the first one to say it. He already has said it. I remember him giving his 5 reasons as to why he should be in Big Bang and the fifth reason was “There is no fifth reason. But if you choose me, I’ll work so hard that you’ll never regret choosing me as a member” So yeah, he doesn’t excel in anything, but he does everything he does well, and he worked hard to get there. And I know people are like ‘who cares if you work hard!’, but it really shows at the end with Seungri. He’s a well-rounded, hardworker, and even if he’s not exceptionally amazing, I still admire him for all it’s worth. (seems to be a common trait in a few of my biases, now that I think about it…)

  • Anon

    i wouldn’t count beg as idols simply because of the way they came together. they were not picked by a company and put together. jea put them together. she decided who should join and who should not. the moment any member has that kind of control over a group, it’s difficult to call them idols.

    and there is no way tablo, tiger jk or tasha are idols. it’s one thing for an artist to change their sound to get mainstream success but that’s not what being an idol is. being an idol group is being put together by a company, being forced to work with each other regardless of personal preference, making music dictated by a company, and having that company work to build a fanbase that will support you regardless of the quality of your music. going on varieties, being minimally talented etc etc is not what makes an idol.

  • Anonymous

    On the topic of ‘questionable group members,’ I think too much emphasis is being put on ranking vocal ability or lack-there-of instead of what they actually contribute to the entire package. If we had that mentality during the 70′s, would Michael Jackson have become the super star that he was? Michael was the one with the talent, but the other 5 brothers were lacking in comparison. If Barry Gordy focused on how lackluster the other boys were instead of Michael, we wouldn’t have Thriller, Off the Wall, etc. If we focused so much on how Bob Dylan’s voice sucked, we would have lost out on a great songwriter who compensated for his lack of vocals with his good writing.

    Seungri may not have the best vocals to some in comparison to Taeyang or Daesung (though in my opinion, his voice is much more tolerable to listen to in long intervals. Taeyang’s nasality can be a tad grating every now and then), or may not have as much rap flow and charisma as GD and TOP, but it’s not like he has no talent at anything he does. Each member is important and has a role on stage and behind the scenes. Taeyang’s the R&B guy, Daesung’s the big voiced balladeer, GD’s the rapper, songwriter, and fashionista who adds spunk and keeps them from becoming too wishy washy and boyband-y where all of them are squeaky clean angels. TOP’s the guy who can get every female in a 20 ft radius staring without trying. Seungri’s the balance between Taeyang’s nasality and Daesung’s deeper timbre so that as a group, they’re balanced and cohesive. He’s also their choreographer.

    What I said about Big Bang can be said for any other group where someone’s talents are ‘questionable’ (except groups like SNSD and Suju where they make the troupe ’80% looks, 20% talent true). Everyone has a role. It doesn’t necessarily have to be the ‘power vocalist’ or the ‘rapper’ so long as they bring something to the table to justify their existence. 

    Back to the main topic at hand (sorry for the derailment), I think the term ‘idol’ needs to be defined beyond being ‘mainstream’ vs. an artist who’s underground. First of all, what makes an idol an idol? Is it the mere worship factor of having a color and fanclub name dedicated to you with hundreds of followers? Is it simply being a tool for the company to make profit through whatever gifts you may possess? Is it being ridiculously pretty or funny to compensate for another flaw? Is it being ridiculously vocally gifted? Is it having an artistic bone in your body and having the ability to write, compose, and produce your own music?

    It’s all of those because for a true ‘idol’ – or I should say a true artist who’s not in it for the glitz and glam – everything goes hand in hand in the long run. Of course, you must have a talent that can feed you if singing isn’t your forte, plus, simply having a pretty voice is boring in this industry of ‘triple threats’: dancing, acting, songwriting, instrument, something! You have to have something likable about you if you’re going to attract people to your music and become fans. You have to have the backup of someone with more money and business savvy than you if you plan to get sales beyond your basement, or online. You have to have some creativity so that you’re not just a rich karaoke singer with no artistic growth who remains stagnant and loses interest from the public.

    • Showmepositivity

      I actually agree with your argument about taking ranking account into talent. If we keep playing the comparison game between idols, then a lot of them are going to seem ‘talentless’. Of course, I don’t think it’s wrong to compare– but I do think using it to judge if someone is talented or not is sort of sketchy.

      Using Seungri as an example, he of course does not compare and match the raw talent of Daesung. But looking at him on his own, he is talented. He’s a decent vocalist and a good dancer. I think instead of seeing how they match up to others, the question should be are they good in their own right. If that makes sense? Unless of course, the person is tone deaf and has not an ounce of natural talent as a singer. Then it’s another story.

      Suzy would be another example, where people do give her an axe for being untalented compared to her bandmates. Even though really, she’s still solid. She’s a good singer, and she lacks in the dance field, but she learns the choreography well.

      I also feel like the whole comparison thing is done very selectively. :/ It’s used to bring down some people and not others. For example, using BB, a lot of people go around comparing Seungri to Taeyang/Daesung. Suzy to the rest of her group. Ect. Where they fall flat in comparison. But I hardly see anyone comparing Taemin to Jonghyun and Onew. Or even Yunho/Yoochun to Junsu and Jaejoong.

      • Anonymous

        Exactly. Since you brought them up: never mind that Taemin’s voice was shaky in their rookie days or that Jonghyun oversings to the point where he loses his voice first (and may lose it all together if he doesn’t learn restraint. Mariah and Whitney proved that all that belting leads to nodules). Yet, the person to hate on is the only bass who was never properly trained in the first place: Minho.

        And let’s not forget everyone’s favorite punching bag now that Wonder Girls are back: Sohee.Is she a powerful vocalist? No. She’s soft spoken and her singing voice is soft, but it’s not like she’s tone deaf and can’t sing in tune to save her life. And now, there’s really no justification to rag on her since she’s singing closer to her proper range and is no longer singing in a chipmunk-y voice (blame JYP for shoving that cutesy role down her throat). If anything I like that her voice is soft, along with Dara’s, Janet, etc. Their voices remind me that I haven’t gone deaf from all these “power vocalists” and Beyonce wannabes (or Beyonce herself) belting and shouting in my ears as if that will convince me of how ‘emotional’ or ‘talented’ they are. And soft voices are good for forcing the belters of any group to learn some restraint and volume control. I also respect Sohee for sticking it out for as long as she has considering that she was never a vocalist or a natural born dancer in the first place. Acting is her first love, and yet she still performs and does her best.

      • JustMe

        I agree with you, and sometimes I think that YG sees Seungri as their future choreographer, he makes it himself for his album, and he’s perfect maknae who can survive between awesomeness of his hyungs.
        For Suzy JYP should let her explore her talent instead of keep her quiet, cute, and release a song once a year

  • Anonymous

    seizure-inducing mv’s
    lackluster songs
    non-existent rapping ability
    barely there vocal capability

  • Anonymous

    What about Big Bang? Well, especially G-Dragon since he composes music. But they’re all seem to be pretty involved in the making of their own music, dances etc And their speech don’t seem too written up beforehand. Aren’t they halfway between idols and “real” (!) artists?

    • Guest

      bigbang is an interesting case because they’re all involved in the production of their music and image.

      gd does a majority of the compositions but they have all composed/written/produced. top has 50 songs under copyright (gd has 100) and there are quite a few songs on bigbang albums where the song is credited to bigbang. it really just says that – bigbang. gd is given producer credit on albums, but each of the boys get co-producer credit and they’re all listed as recording directors. and they all have quite a bit of say in what they wear, how they look, their choreography etc.

      but they’re still held to idol standards. yg can and has scrapped songs because he felt they couldn’t be released by an idol group. half of gd&top’s album was banned. they’re still looked up to and there are limits to how far they can push the limits. they’re kind of in the middle atm and it’ll be interesting to see where they go from here.

  • Capri08

    The difference between an  ”idol” and a “non-idol” is…..
    Idols in the music industry were pre-teens or teenagers, that didn’t necessary make their fame on music. They made it off of their personalities or the personalities their companies wanted them to present to the listeners. Idols in the acting industry would mostly likely be child stars, and they would play the cute and/or funny roles in to family sitcoms or movie. Now the down side to this is aging. How long are going to sing just to teenagers being as old as they would be. Or try to act being in their mid-twenties.The entrainment industry, is very harsh on idols. Because they would be adults with little talent. And those who did have talent would have to prove themselves as actors/actresses. As for musicians they have to show that they could come out of the teen faze and come into adulthood.Examples of musician is Justin Timberlake, Britney Spears, Christian Aguilera, Joey Lawrence, Luke Perry, Hilary Duffy, Miley Cyrus ext…Examples of actors/actress Shirley Temple, Drew Barrymore, Leonardo DiCaprio, Christina Applegate, Winona Ryder, Harry Potter kids, Marky mark ext…Side Note: If you don’t know some of these people look them up, I’m giving old examples.

  • Pingback: Harry Potter Kids Costume Deluxe Gryffindor Robe (Child-Large Size) #882170 | Halloween Costumes Ideas

  • Pingback: jilltrader

  • Pingback: dancing with the stars cast list

  • Pingback: On Pitting Kpop Idols Against Non-Idols « High Yellow