Socio-Cultural
20120219_seoulbeats_hyuna

Bursting the K-pop Bubble

35

Until recent years, K-pop has been South Korea’s little secret. What was known to very few countries has spread to become a rapidly growing business around the globe. Granted, hallyu hasn’t fully solidified to become a booming global phenomenon, but one can almost guarantee that K-pop companies will continue to do everything in their power to make sure their voice is heard world round. The year 2008 started what has become the biggest stride for the wave to the international masses, but 2012 will be taking even bigger steps in order to place K-pop onto the global music map. To say the least, 2012 will be a very interesting year for K-pop.

CNN recently released an article called South Korea’s K-pop Takes Off in the West in which the author highlights the strides that K-pop has made over the years. All of it was relatively flattering, until the last paragraph that said “While cultural exports are a source of national pride, Koreans are also calling for improved regulation of the industry. The suicide of Jang Ja-yeon, a soap starlet, in 2009, focused attention on hallyu’s dark underworld where some performers are locked into slave contracts and are told to sleep with managers to win roles.” After all the praise the article gave out it did come off as a hit below the belt (not that there wasn’t truth to it), but this is something that will be a common occurrence if K-pop continues to spread. With newfound fame and more attention comes new found responsibility. This responsibility comes by catering to growing demographics and adapting to different cultures.  As K-entertainers begin moving out of the country, they will be impacted by increased scrutiny on a whole new level not previously seen before. As eyes focus on this new found phenomenon, it will begin to get dissected for the entire world to see. The foundation on which K-pop was built was definitely a shaky one, and something that could come to haunt the industry as it continues to progress.

There is an increasing demand for K-pop and it must in response transform itself to become more soluble for the masses if it plans to make any head way. Yes, K-pop could stay in Korea, but there wouldn’t be much money to be made. That’s why it’s answering so many love calls and trying to break new ground in stronger markets. It’s usually the people in demand who get to call the shots, but this isn’t necessarily going to be the case for South Korea. In order to win the game, Korean companies are going to have to play by the rules of the foreign markets rather than their own. The reason Korean entertainment companies wouldn’t be able to do the same as, say, Japanese or US companies is because the Korean music industry industry is not self sustaining. Japan and the US could distribute their music solely in their own country and would still earn more revenue than they would internationally. International purchases would somewhat be like an added bonus to the wealth already accumulated in their home markets. However, South Korea doesn’t have that privilege.

What the success of KARA and the disappointment of 2NE1 in Japan have proven is that not every kind of music is meant for every region of the world at every given time. Of course, things can change in the future, and success can be followed by failure or vice versa, but the complexity of human beings makes it hard to always guess what will be a hit and what will be a miss. If it was always so easy than from a K-pop standpoint, SNSD would be the biggest K-pop girl group in Japan, but in reality, KARA takes that position. I actually like it this way because there’s diversity in the thinking. Amongst K-pop girl groups, KARA has a hold on Japan, SNSD on South Korea, the Wonder Girls on China, and who’s to know who will take the leadership role in Europe and the Americas when the time comes. What works in South Korea will not always work everywhere else. Thus groups must cater to different markets in order to see fruition.

It’s like K-pop is in a relationship with all of the different industries they enter into, but haven’t necessarily found a way to handle it. At first the boundary was resilient, but once K-pop made its way through, hallyu became an increasingly accepted phenomenon and the material began to get soaked up by the masses. But the reciprocation of appreciation hasn’t consistently been found, thus producing the growing anti-hallyu movement. K-pop numerously lacks a genuineness that many foreign consumers are looking for. As time goes by, many consumers of the K-pop brand are beginning to feel used. Over time, it’s become apparent that these consumers are being exploited for their wallets, rather than being treated by entertainment companies like the valuable customers and clientele that they are.

The somewhat sad but true reality is that K-pop is going to have to tweak itself for other markets if it’s going to have any chance of major success. That’s already the case in terms of K-pop spreading to Japan, China, and now the Americas and Europe. It’s been apparent that when these groups venture into other countries’ markets such as Japan and China their music and sound have slightly changed, sometimes dramatically so. Many have even pointed out how the material is even better when released in these countries. This is probably due to more artistic freedom.

I would prefer K-pop stay as true to itself as possible, but I know that wouldn’t get it as far as it would like to go. There is no question K-pop is changing to cater to these different tastes, but the big question is, “Is K-pop changing fast enough?”

(CNN via Sweet Potato Days)

Related Posts

  • http://twitter.com/EAG0493 Enas AG

    I have one thing to say and that’s GIRL POWER. SNSD, Kara, Wonder Girls. Although there are popular boy groups internationally, these girl groups take the cake. :) 

    • Anonymous

      Which boy groups are popular internationally? 

      • Anonymous

        Super Junior.

        South East Asia loves them.

        • Anonymous

          Thanks for the information.

        • Anonymous

          Bit unfortunate for SEA that the group is likely going to disband within the next few years.

          With members heading off to the military (2+ years) one by one, it won’t be until several years when they’re all reunited as one group of all 13 members.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/배희박/100001008247053 배희박

        Hello DBSK? in Japan
        ~accepted as j-atists~

        • Anonymous

          Thanks for the information.

      • Anonymous

        bigbang in north america, europe (especially uk and france) and south america. most of the sm groups are also popular in north america and europe. 2pm in thailand. i think a lot of boy groups are popular in south east asia. someone already mentioned suju but bigbang, 2pm, dbsk (and jyj) also have sizable fanbases in many parts of asia. suju and bigbang are also popular in the middle east.

        b2st and shinee are up there.  

  • Anonymous

    I somehow hope that Ali can be successful in for example Europe or America. 

    I think that 2ne1 can be successful in Europe. 

    It is a very romantic idea that people want something different but most people want something that is more or less the same as the things they already know. So kpop has to become more Western to become successful in the West. 

    It raises the question if the world is becoming more diverse or less diverse. I think it is becoming less diverse. I’m not sure about this.

    • Anonymous

      That’s kind of how I feel too. Westerners love groups like 2NE1, Big Bang, and B.A.P. because the sound is very familiar. That is also why Japan has taken a liking to KARA. As much as international K-pop lovers say they like K-pop because of its difference to their homeland music, it is sort of ironic how we flock to the music that is more familiar and similar to our own.

      • Anonymous

        Yes, if ‘we’ really enjoy difference than ‘we’ would listen to something like Indonesian Gamelan music (very sophisticated stuff) and not to kpop. But do ‘we’ do? 

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6NR4CWLS6RLSC6PCXOWJ2HQLJA PasserBy

          I love Gamelan music… I always listen to/watch it live though.

    • Anonymous

      I sometimes get the feeling that if the Kpop sound doesn’t fit European, Japanese, or American tastes, it shouldn’t change and just keep on doing what its doing, whether or not it’s successful. But then I remember that the people looking to branch out to other markets are part of the pop genre for the money. We can’t judge companies and groups that’ll have to fit to Western music styles for the monetary success because it washes out the sound of the genre; Kpop doesn’t represent Korean music, its just pop music in another language.  Kpop is in fact DERIVATIVE of Western pop. Yes, Kpop has this kitschy sound and concept and image based thing that makes it unique, but ultimately, its all similar. 

  • Anonymous

    I think 2ne1 has the best chances in the States. I’m not saying this out of fan devotion, but because quite a few American starlets and producers have already acknowledged them, Swizz Beats being the most recent one. He said he’d like to have the girl collaborate with Rihanna. Of all the Kpop girl groups, 2ne1 appears to be attracting the most favorable Western attention without even trying. Producers like Swizz Beats and Will.I.Am noticed 2ne1 for who they already are in South K, so the group wouldn’t have to change that much at all to appeal to Americans.

  • Anonymous

    It only takes one curious, influential journalist to completely unravel the hopes of a K-POP Western expansion. 

    A lot of offensive shit happens in K-POP and it’s been well documented. We’ll wait and see.

  • Anonymous

    What the dangers of K-pop is the fraud companies that are so numerous in Korea itself. They need to be dismantled and destroyed (yes, literally).

  • Anonymous

    Honestly kpop should try to go to Europe because they are more accepting of groups compared to America. The US fascination of groups is a thing of a past and I think artists who try are commendable for their efforts but realistically I do not see asian artists being big in the America music scene. They have better chances of going solo then in a group.

  • Anonymous

    For any group to make it successful in the US, they must have either skill or creativity. Both is of course appreciated, but creativity tends to matter more whether its the song, “concept,” or even creative dance. Through the creativity, personality shows through. The problem with Korea groups is that they market packaged performance. Sure 2NE1 has more of a free form, but still there is a feeling that rubs off like the songs and the stage is just a package. 
    But what I hate the most is changing to please.
    For all Kpop groups out there, find your sound. 
    Own your sound.
    Then Spread it.
    Music should have meaning, some at least.

  • Anonymous

    Well my jam for most of 2010 was “shots shots shots shots shots shots”, sooooo I think to break into the American industry you need a hit song. The same way it works in Korea. Hits songs = fame and notoriety.

  • Anonymous

    At the risk of sounding stupid, I want to ask if there are specific reasons why SK can’t rely on their own entertainment industry and have to expand outwards? Japan and the US may have a larger number of people but SK should have a sizable economy for entertainment to support its needs with almost 50 million people? Granted Japan is more than double the population and the US many times more…

    Is it because most of the population are aging grandparents and are likely not interested in Kpop? Along with the idea that pop music and K-music in general is not diverse enough to cater to everyone’s desires? Is it the music itself and “lack of talent” that is preventing Kpop from being “self sustaining” or is it simply because of population numbers? I’m just guessing randomly here, so could someone elaborate?

    • Anonymous

      It’s all about money. With Internet there’s a lot of people to DL illegally. Album sales also don’t return a great profit for companies or artist.( I remember TLC said they made 3 cents per album sold so after waterfalls, they were still broke. That was when artists were still capable of selling over 1 million if it was a popular album. It’s concerts that return a profit if it sells well. In Korea there are a lot of free and easy ways to see idols and they don’t have a huge music buying public. America gets people notoriety worldwide which equals more money. As a country that buys music, CDs, and attends concerts though, it’s Japan.

    • Anonymous

      Well, the sales figures speak for themselves. For instance, in 2010, the Japanese music industry made 3,958.5 million dollars in revenue. The Korean music industry? 178.4 million. Not to mention this value signifies already a 65% increase since the end of 2007, which was when the K-pop industry started gathering the international attention. Why South Korean sales seem so low comparatively, even though the size of their population is only little less than half of Japan’s? I don’t know, but this is the reality. 

      And there’s an additional problem: expenses. The K-pop industry holds insanely high costs – the long training periods, the artist manufacturing (which includes everything from clothes to plastic surgery), the staff, the high quality video production, the promotions. And multiply this by 4 or 5 bands, and 2 or 3 soloists and you can pretty much have an idea how much a successful company needs to invest. This is where shareholders and investors come in.

      If these companies were to merely rely on physical sales profit, they wouldn’t be able to make these flashy comebacks, even less pay for these expensive MVs with Teddy Riley. In turn, shareholders of these companies demand profit guarantees in the product they’re investing in, and the most common way to please these rich business men is to promise them market expansion. Also, YG, SM (and JYP too, I guess?) are now listed in the Korean stock market exchange, which pressures companies even more to maintain and increase their stock value by constantly releasing singles to please investors. As singles are insanely expensive to produce, and shareholders still want their profit guarantees, the reality of their relatively small domestic market keeps forcing the companies to desperately search for ways to increase their number of consumers.

      Many other countries have their own little music scene and barely export, and their artists still survive. But K-pop exists in a different reality. Idols are now treated as a financial asset, instead of a cultural asset. If on one hand this entrance in Kosdaq represented more money to the companies, on the other hand, they’re now at more risk of bankruptcy, if they fail to meet certain revenue figures. 

      I hope this answered your question as to why K-pop needs these exports so badly. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/JQ4QKTC2RVKJOKR6LXTILND4DM kat

    I’ve been listening to less K-music, save 2ne1′s songs, but even that, I feel that I’m losing interest. More and more, I feel that I am going back to my roots – the old school beatles-queen-air supply, my alternative rock/acoustic oasis-coldplay-john mayer. Is KPOP just a phase one goes through? Much like puberty or a high school crush? Am I the only one feeling this way?

    • kagero tanaka

      No you’re not the only one feeling this way. I have been finding myself listening less and less to K-pop these days myself. I find myself listening to old school K-pop music, music prior till 2005. You bring up such a great point, it does seem like K-pop has become a phrase one goes through, it’s like the whole everyone-loved anime and manga and then suddenly this interest in all things Japan= Otaku effect…sort of the same effect that Korea is going through. I remember ten years ago when I first got into K-pop these blogs and sites like All-kpop didn’t exist and Soompi was the only source for all things Korean-culture related…But now that Hallyu is speading it’s taking on the Otaku effect. I enjoyed K-pop, when it mostly exclusive to Korea, that what made it unique for me. Also, I think for me the turn-off is the all the focus on idols and the constantly churning out of groups that just fade into obscurity soon afterwards. The lack of quality of music as well. I just pretty much stick to who I know and veteran performers and YG family who seem to always produce some decent quality music, no not just from BB or 2NE1 speaking of Gummy and Se7en. 

      Trust me you are not the only one my friend :)

    • Anonymous

      I couldn’t agree more.

      K-POP is the trend right now. It’ll show pass and the next hot thing will take over.

  • Anonymous

    This is Meanie…

    Some of the comments in the K-pop and Consumer Nationalism  post could go here.  http://seoulbeats.com/2012/02/k-pop-and-consumer-nationalism/

    Let’s be honest… Kpop is not the great music of our time. 

    1. It’s appropriating part of a music culture and style of black people. R&B/Hip-Hop/Pop, etc…

    2. It’s not respecting the people that they are appropriating from and making money off of.

    3. And America has been there done that 3x over..

    The funny thing is America is definitely known to do all 3 within it’s country, so I guess what’s else is new?  I believe if someone did make it from SK it will be outside the KPop bubble. I think what SK is going to have to do is expand it’s music genre under the Hallyu wave: Rock, Hip Hop (The real hip hop), Pop, R&B, Jazz, etc… Most of these kpop groups are basically robots, counting steps in their heads and not showing any emotion.  Some people can’t sing in the group or can’t dance or both.

    I know people will say well what about Rhianna, Katy Perry, etc.. They can’t sing or really dance.  True but out of the thousands of musician’s in America under 100 genre’s they are but a few.

    4. I don’t understand why Yoon Mi Rae isn’t pushed more (Well I do and I don’t) but she can MC and sing.

    5. SK is going to have to diversify for America, meaning you are going to have to see people of color up in you’re video’s (Black, Asian, Latino, White) Or you going to have to see people of color in your group.  Although America is diversified it can be funny acting sometimes when it comes to racial politricks, especially if you want to go mainstream.  Radio in America is segregated, actually it’s more segregated now then it was during the disco era.

    Mainstream- White folks gave it the ok, but it might have taken Black, Asian, Latino to put them on the map.  Case in point The Black Eye Peas- I remember when it was just the the 3 of them Will I Am, Apl.de.ap and Taboo. They didn’t make it big until they added Fergie. 

    Another example is Far East Movement…They didn’t have to include any other person of color in the group BUT in the MV’s they definitely included black people (Rocketeer, Jello) and a variety of other women.

    So the question is who is Kpop marketing to in America?  What racial demographic are they going for?  We can’t sweep it under the rug like this doesn’t exist and that it doesn’t play a big role.  Just think of the Jeremy Lin (Basketball-NY Knicks) situation now.

    Nobody was checking Robin Thicke (Well some) when he had the long hair, riding on his bike and singing- (When I get you alone- http://youtu.be/nNg0ReHeTiM).  Once he cut that hair, start dressing up in suits and getting down to that R&B/Soul sound did he get over, but he got over because of Black women.SK needs to understand- Never underestimate the buying power of POC’s in America.

  • http://twitter.com/roboseyo Roboseyo Ouwehand

    What do you mean when you say “I would prefer K-pop to stay as true to itself as possible”? What one person calls integrity, another calls stubbornness, and one commentator’s consistency is another’s refusal to change with the market.

    • Anonymous

      I understand what your saying but what I mean is that I want K-pop to be known more for genuineness (even though I know  a heavy amount is imitation) than for it’s similarity to other countries music. I just feel like what K-pop is doing right now, even though it can get other audiences to notice them, is going to blow up in its face.But I understand it’s too late for all of that because this way of marketing is what people are eating up and what got it notoriety. Hope that clarifies it.

      • Anonymous

        Renie_one, I’ve gotta say… K-pop is many things, but genuine isn’t one of them. The artists aren’t writing their own music, or planning their own dances, or deciding the concepts for their own videos. The songs chosen by the management team are the ones most likely to sell – either in the Korean market, or in another market, not the ones that most genuinely express the artist’s sincere emotions: 

        K-pop is very good at what it does… but what it does is one of the most commercial packagings of entertainment content that’s ever existed. There’s nothing wrong with that: they’re amazing at reading their audiences, and giving them what they want… but there’s nothing genuine about that process, other than being genuinely profitable… and most often, genuinely fun.

  • http://twitter.com/asucahayashi fei lee

    “Many have even pointed out how the material is even better when released in these countries.”

    • Anonymous

      It probably wouldn’t gain much fandom from teen girls in the US, under the general assumption that many are so busy worshipping Beiber like cultists.

  • Anonymous

    Kara ^^

  • Anonymous

    Another point I’d like to add, and I’m pretty sure this has been emphasized before, is that if Kpop is marketing toward teens as a pure pop genre then they might be able to get by, but if they’re trying to market toward an older audience, high school, college age consumers, they are going to have to sex it up a bit. And i know Kpop does market sex, but we don’t like it in that weird young girl & oppa/young boy & noona nonsense. Stars like Adele don’t have to really sex it up because their talent speaks for itself (and even Adele has done a total revamp of her image), but stars with minimal talent and just looks, i. e. Rihanna, Katy Perry, Kesha etc. rely a lot on their sexy image. Nobody in Kpop has got that grown women vibe, except maybe the actual grown women like Kahi, BEG, that other girl that hangs out with Kahi whose name escapes me…,and maybe Hyuna. And there’s just something about kpop that I feel is a tad bit offputting after awhile, and US consumers get over things quite quickly.

    Also, I think the electro window that was a perfect opportunity for Kpop to be introduced is closing now. Look at the grammys! Everything went to Adele, Bon Iver won best new artist. If Kpop wants to make it, they’re going to have to think out of the box, maybe hook up with Skrillex or something. The fact that Swizz Beats find it so interesting is just funny to me. How is he going to market Kpop to the African American and Latino populations, which are his main audience…

    • Anonymous

      >minimal talent and just looks, i. e. Rihanna, Katy Perry

      In the case of Katy Perry, does personality and the fact that she writes her own music whole or in part (2 of her top 3 hits were hers alone) count?

      Point to a K-Pop star who can claim as much.

  • Anonymous

     I don’t see why Kpop needs to change… I think that majority of Kpop fans outside of Korea got into it for it’s uniqueness. You don’t need to push the whole Kpop ideology or transform it in to something else for it to be palatable for western market. I’m not looking for Kpop to ever be a mainstream thing here in America. I would be satisfied even if Kpop can becomes a niche form of music here in the West…

    As for the whole suicide thing in Korea. It’s not just an issue in Korea but Japan and China as well. East Asians place high value on saving face or the concept of keeping up appearances and frown on ppl who seek self help from Psychologists as they see it as a form of weakness or see you as somehow being tainted.
    On the other hand seeing as how many of our Western celebrities choose self help from their problems and pressures through self medication with drugs and alcohol we can’t really point fingers either. We have long list of Celebrities who died too young from self abuse Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Elvis, Jim Belushi, Michael Jackson, Amy Winehouse, Marilyn Monroe, Whitney Houston etc.. etc.. etc…
    Whether a Asian celebrity chooses to make a fast exit through suicide or a Western celebrity chooses to self medication and the slow inevitable death that eventually comes with it. It all boils down to the same thing, pressures of fame and stardom…